+44 (0)20 7306 email@example.com
Emer has a broad business and commercial practice, and provides drafting, advisory and advocacy services in a range of commercial sectors.
Emer was ranked as ‘Up and Coming’ in the Chancery Commercial (London) field by Chambers and Partners 2017, and was described as follows: ‘A thinker and a doer… She adds real value and makes good contributions’.
Emer is a member of the Commercial Bar Association.
Notable cases include the following:
Clutterbuck v Al Amoudi  EWHC 383 (Ch),  EWCA Civ 1593
- Emer successfully represented Sarah Al Amoudi, dubbed “the Vamp in the Veil” by the Daily Mail, against two property developers who alleged that Ms Amoudi duped them out of millions of pounds of cash and property.
- Emer acted as a junior to Jonathan Seitler QC at a four-week trial in the Chancery Division involving over 30 witnesses.
- In October 2015, the claimants said they had new evidence that proved that Ms Al Amoudi was an imposter. Emer and Jonathan successfully represented Ms Al Amoudi in the Court of Appeal, where the applications to rely on this evidence and for permission to appeal were refused.
- The case raised issues of property joint ventures, fraud and misrepresentation.
Clutterbuck v Cleghorn  EWHC 2558,  EWCA Civ 137
- As a junior to Jonathan Seitler QC, Emer acts for the defendant (representing a deceased’s estate) in this offshoot of the Clutterbuck v Al Amoudi case.
- The claimants alleged that the deceased entered into and subsequently breached various property joint ventures relating to numerous expensive properties in West London.
- The defendant’s legal team successfully had the majority of the claim struck out as an abuse of process relying on the principle in Aldi Stores  1 WLR 748, as the claimants had failed to bring their claim with other similar claims against Ms Al Amoudi.
- The Court of Appeal upheld the striking out of the majority of the claimants’ case in March 2017.
Clutterbuck v HSBC and others (2015)
- In a third spin-off case from the Clutterbuck v Al Amoudi proceedings (above), the same claimants sued three banks, four law firms and a series of other professionals alleging that those professionals knowingly assisted Ms Al Amoudi to carry out various frauds.
- Emer (on her own account) successfully represented one of the law firms in the High Court.
- Following an unsuccessful attempt to adjourn a strike out application against them, the Claimants discontinued their claims against the firm.
- This action relates to a substantial mixed-use property in North London, held by a company which was jointly owned by two wealthy families and later sold.
- Emer (acting as a junior to James Ayliffe QC) is acting for a company associated with one of the families, alleging deceit and breach of fiduciary duty by the other family and its associated companies in relation to the sale.
- The claim is potentially worth several million pounds.
Abbar v SEDCO and others  EWHC 1414 (Ch)
- This case concerned the Pinnacle Tower, designed to be the tallest tower in the City of London, which (following a series of delays to its development) was later nicknamed ‘the Stump’.
- The claim was brought by a disgruntled Middle Eastern investor who had advanced significant sums of money toward the development, and who alleged that he had been misled about the basis of his investment.
- At a two-week trial in the High Court, acting as a junior to Ali Malek QC and Rupert Reed QC, Emer successfully represented the developer defendants.
Ackerman v Ackerman  EWHC 2183 (Ch);  3 Costs L.O. 303
- This case concerned an expert determination in the context of a bitterly-fought division of a very large family-owned property portfolio.
- Emer assisted John Wardell QC and Andrew Mold on various aspects of this case, including successfully representing the defendants in their application for security for costs.