Call +44 207 306 0102 or contact us

Joanne Wicks QC

Call: 1990    QC: 2010

+44 (0)20 7306 0102jwicks@wilberforce.co.uk

Property

Joanne is recommended as a Leading Silk for property/real estate litigation in the major legal directories. The Legal 500 says she is “great with clients and excellent on paper”. Chambers & Partners says “the way she picks up facts is very impressive. She is very astute and you always feel like she knows what’s going on in the case”, whilst Who’s Who Legal – UK Bar 2016 places her in its list of just eight “most highly regarded leading silks” for Real Estate, saying she is “an ‘outstanding talent’ at the Bar whose broad practice enables her to offer clients ‘creative solutions’”.

Joanne’s practice encompasses all aspects of property law. She acts in disputes resolved through litigation, arbitration and expert determination and also advises transactional lawyers on title issues and the drafting of property contracts. Joanne takes instructions from surveyors and other professionals eligible to instruct the Bar directly.

Her property practice includes:

  • Appearing for the prospective purchaser of an office block in Luton, which recovered its deposit and damages following fraudulent misrepresentations by the seller (Greenridge Luton One Ltd v Kempton Investments Ltd [2016] EWHC 91)
  • Appearing for a developer seeking to establish that a covenant imposed to secure overage was not binding upon it (Bryant Homes Southern Ltd v Stein Management Ltd)
  • Acting for Joseph, the fashion retailer, in a claim against Stella McCartney Ltd under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 in relation to a shop in Old Bond Street
  • Acting for a right to manage company on an appeal by a landlord to the Court of Appeal contesting its acquisition of the right to manage under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (Miltonland v Platinum House (Harrow) RTM Co Ltd)
  • Representing a supermarket chain in a dispute as to whether a contract to acquire a site was properly terminated because the planning permission was not ‘satisfactory’ (Norcros Estates Ltd v Optimisation Developments Ltd & WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc)
  • Advising the developer of a very substantial London site on the impact of a scheme of restrictive covenants affecting part of it
  • Obtaining injunctions against developers which, having failed in their attempts to purchase neighbouring land, decided to annex it for the purposes of their development anyway (Charlie Properties Ltd v Risetall Ltd)
  • Acting for a tenant facing a claim for indemnity costs following settlement of a large-scale dilapidations claim (Courtwell Properties Ltd v Greencore PF (UK) Ltd [2014] EWHC 184)