Call +44 207 306 0102 or contact us

Jonathan Chew

Call: 2010   

+44 (0)20 7306


Jonathan has a specialised commercial chancery practice with a particular emphasis on fraud and disputes relating to complex structures, particularly with an international element. This specialism is in addition to contractual interpretation, tortious and restitutionary claims that form part of his commercial work.

He has practical experience of advising and obtaining interim relief (freezing injunctions, Norwich Pharmacal and Bankers’ Trust orders) and of succeeding in hard-fought multi-week trials as part of a wider counsel team.
Jonathan is regularly instructed in matters relating to Dubai, whether in Dubai, where he appears before the DIFC Courts, or in London on matters arising out of the Middle East.

Ongoing matters include:

  • Acting for investors victims of a multi-million pound fraud arising out of a major property development in North London.
  • Successfully obtaining interim relief in respect of victims of fraud in support of a potential claim against fraudsters or associated advisers.
  • Acting for a guarantor against whom a multi-million pound claim has been made by an offshore investment vehicle.

Recent reported matters include:

  • Tavira Securities v Point Ventures FCZO [2017] CFI 26: acting as sole counsel against a silk in a jurisdiction challenge in the DIFC in litigation relating to an alleged share transaction.
  • Matchmove v Dowding [2017] 1 WLR 749: led by Jonathan Seitler QC, acting on an appeal relating to constructive trusts.
  • MASNOL v Cripps Harries Hall [2016] EWHC 2483 (Ch): led by Jonathan Seitler QC, successfully defending two solicitors accused of fraud. After a hard-fought multi-week trial, the individuals involved were wholly exonerated and indemnity costs obtained.
  • Caliendo v Mishcon de Reya [2016] EWHC 150 (Ch): led by Ian Croxford QC and Clare Stanley QC, successfully defending a firm of solicitors accussed of breach of fiduciary duty and negligence arising out of the sale of QPR football club.
  • DAMAC Park Towers Company v Ward (14 December 2015) CA 006/2015: Acting for the DAMAC Group in the DIFC Court of Appeal on a successful appeal in which the Chief Justice confirmed the contractual validity of property reservation agreements and a commercial approach to the construction of the related credit agreements
  • Dany Lions v Bristol Cars [2014] 2 All ER (Comm) 403: a successful High Court trial as sole counsel arguing that a contractual clause was too vague to be binding, alternatively that reasonable endeavours had been used.