Max Mallin QC
Call: 1993 QC: 2017
+44 (0)20 7306 email@example.com
Max is a “well regarded” civil fraud practitioner whose financial background makes him an ideal choice for complicated asset tracing claims. He is recommended by both Chambers UK and The Legal 500 who refer to the fact that he has a “very quick mind” and “gives clear directional guidance”.
Some of his recent work includes:
- Eminent Energy v Daxin Baltic. Max acts for the Claimant in this Commercial Court claim for damages and declarations arising out of the supply of Naphtha to the Claimant by the Defendant. The Defendant alleges fraud and conspiracy. In March 2016, Max obtained an urgent without notice injunction to prevent the Defendant from disposing of a quantity of Naphtha held at a storage facility in Latvia. The case will come to trial in 2017.
- Nextam v Mughal. Max acted for the Claimant in his claim for breach of fiduciary duty/fraud against a former director. Max obtained a number of urgent interlocutory orders (including freezing and disclosure orders) before obtaining judgment for about £2 million in October 2015. Max also represented the Claimant in its application to commit the Defendant to prison for contempt of Court. Following a 4 day hearing, Whipple J committed the Defendant to prison in March 2016  EWHC 367 (QB).
- In the matter of African Safari Club Limited (in liquidation). Max acts for the liquidators in this claim against ex-directors for fraud/breach of fiduciary duty and compensation under sections 212 and 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The case is set down for trial in March 2017.
- ICF v Mistry. Max acted for the Claimant in this claim for damages/equitable compensation against an ex-director of the claimant company. Max obtained a freezing injunction on very short notice in March 2016.
- African Land Ltd v Haddow & others: Max acted for the Claimant in this high value action for fraud and breach of contract in relation to investment in plots of land in Sierra Leone. Max obtained a number of interlocutor orders on behalf of the Claimant including freezing injunction prior to the settlement of the case.
- NASS v Innospec  EWHC 3147 (comm): Max acted for the Claimant in this multi-million dollar claim for damages for conspiracy to bribe Iraqi officials to induce them to buy a competitor’s petroleum products.