Jonathan Hilliard QC
Call: 2003 QC: 2016
+44 (0)20 7306 email@example.com
Jonathan is ranked in Chambers Global and Chambers & Partners (UK) for his civil fraud and offshore work.
In relation to the former, Chambers & Partners 2019 describes him as “very user-friendly. He has an encyclopaedic knowledge of insolvency-based fraud issues”. “Very dependable and really knows his stuff. He’s on the ball and deeply analytical in his approach to complex matters.” Similarly, Chambers and Partners 2020 states that “he is technically excellent”. “Very personable and level-headed in his advice.”
In relation to the latter, Chambers and Partners states that “Jonathan is an extremely commercial and savvy trusts operator. He’s really passionate about his subject and knows it inside out”. “He’s a creative thinker and very clever.” (Chambers & Partners 2020, Offshore); “Very dependable and really knows his stuff. He’s on the ball and deeply analytical in his approach to complex matters.” (Chambers & Partners 2019, Offshore); “He is an extraordinarily brilliant individual.” (Chambers & Partners 2018, Offshore)
A significant amount of Jonathan’s work concerns business and commercial disputes, particularly those relating to:
- Civil fraud
- Asset tracing
- Financial services
- Regulatory issues
- Company and partnership issues
Jonathan’s work in these areas frequently overlaps with his offshore and trusts practices, many of these disputes having an international element, involving fraud or heavy factual disputes, and involving fiduciaries acting in a financial services context. He also has significant experience on the domestic side of the Upper Tribunal’s financial services jurisdiction and financial services judicial review.
On the civil fraud side, to take some recent examples:
- He is involved in a number of large ongoing currently confidential offshore cases across a range of jurisdictions involving allegations of fraud and other linked wrongdoing.
- He has been involved in obtaining injunctions in offshore asset recovery proceedings.
- He has been involved in a number of pensions liberations fraud and tracing cases, such as the landmark Pensions Regulator v PAYAE & ors (2018) case.
Previously, by way of examples:
- He acted successfully as part of the claimants’ team in ITS v GP Noble [2009-2013], which involved fraud proceedings in a number of jurisdictions, a number of significant hearings and parallel criminal proceedings.
- He acted successfully as part of the claimants’ team in the Court of Appeal in ITS v Susan Morris [2011-2013] in tracing the proceedings of fraud into a divorce settlement.
- He was involved in litigation concerning the largest alleged fraud in recent Latvian history.
On the regulatory side, for example:
- He has been involved in the recent leading cases before the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) concerning the limits of the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal in financial services matters.
- He often acts in relation to regulatory investigations.
- He has been involved in a number of pieces of financial services judicial review matters, including in relation to the life insurance industry.
As far as insolvency is concerned, much of his pensions work takes him into the insolvency arena, and he frequently advises alongside or acts together with insolvency counsel. Examples of his reported insolvency cases include:
- Nortel & Lehman v TPR [2010-2013] (first instance, CA and SC- when a statutory debt ranks as a provable debt or expense).
- Singer & Friedlander  (calculation of debts in insolvency).
- Gleave v PPF (proof for s.75 debts in insolvency).