+44 (0)20 7306 email@example.com
Thomas acts across a wide range of pensions matters, on behalf of scheme trustees, scheme members, employers and bodies such as the PPF and Pensions Regulator. He has advised on matters from the operation of section 67 of the Pensions Act 1995 and section 37 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 to trustees’ duties and the PPF Levy.
He has a particular interest in the interplay between pensions and insolvency law, and has written on this topic for pensions and insolvency publications. He frequently advises insolvency practitioners in relation to pensions issues. He is also instructed on rectification matters, both as sole counsel and as part of a team (for example acting in 2018 for the representative beneficiary in an a claim by Honda Motor Europe Ltd to rectify scheme documentation from 1986).
Tom is recommended as “One of the best pensions regulatory lawyers in the field” (Legal 500 2016). He has been instructed by the Pensions Regulator in complex multi-jurisdictional commercial cases seeking Financial Support Directions (FSD) and Contribution Notices (CN) under the Pensions Act 2004, raising issues of commercial and insolvency law. These include Silentnight, MG Rover, Nortel Networks, Lehman Brothers, Michel van de Wiele NV (“Bonas”), Carrington Wire and Desmond & Sons Limited. Tom has appeared before the Regulator’s Determinations Panel, the Upper Tribunal, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court as a result of these instructions. He has also been instructed as counsel to the Determinations Panel of the Pensions Regulator, including in cases concerning skilled persons reports under s.71 of the Pensions Act 2004, the removal of scheme trustees, and in the ‘Box Clever’ case.
Separately, Tom has advised other parties to “moral hazard” investigations, and acted for trustees and companies more generally in relation to pension scheme matters.
- Re Chas A. Blatchford & Sons Pension Scheme  EWHC 2743 (Ch). First pensions rectification case to consider the Court of Appeal’s guidance in FSHC on rectification for common mistake.
- ARG Realisations 2016 Ltd v Stuart  EWHC 1265 (Ch): Part 8 Rectification claim, with consideration of use of confidential opinions by the court.
- R (on the application of Grace Bay II Holdings SARL and others) v The Pensions Regulator  EWHC 7 (Admin),  All ER (D) 29 (Jan). Application for Judicial Review of decision by the Pensions Regulator to issue a second Warning Notice in the Silentnight case. Application successfully resisted on grounds of alternative remedy.
- Ongoing instructions in regulatory investigations that remain confidential at present.
- Re Carrington Wire DB Pension Scheme. Successful pursuit of Contribution Notice against individual under “material detriment test” of s.38A PA 04, and settlement of £8.5m with Russian owners of UK wire company. March 2015. Acted for Pensions Regulator.
- Re MG Rover Group Limited. Regulatory proceedings seeking FSD. Case settled in 2014.
- Re Desmond & Sons Limited [2010-2015]. First issue of CN to individuals, in sum of £1m, from use of MVL to trigger employer debt to pension scheme. Acted for Pensions Regulator at hearing before Determinations Panel, Upper Tribunal (2010 and 2014) and in the Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland, 2012). Listed for 3 week hearing in May 2015. Settled during week one.
- Re Storm Funding (in administration)  Bus L R 454;  Pens LR 73,  EWHC 4019 (Ch). Considered issues including the Parliamentary intention of the FSD regime and the insolvency rule against “double dipping”. Acted for the Pensions Regulator with Raquel Agnello QC and Jonathan Hilliard.
- Re Nortel GmbH and Others  AC 209,  UKSC 52 &  EWCA Civ 1124 &  EWHC 3010. Successful resistance of application by administrators of Nortel and Lehman Brothers in the High Court for declaration that an FSD and CN issued under Pensions Act 2004 to insolvent companies did not give rise to any right to recovery. Briggs J. held they gave rise to administration expenses which was upheld by Court of Appeal in October 2011. In July 2013 the Supreme Court decided that FSDs give rise to provable debts. Listed by the Lawyer in their ‘Top 20 cases of 2012’.
- Trustees of Lehman Brothers Pension Scheme v Pensions Regulator  4 All ER 744;  085 PBLR (040). Court of Appeal and Upper Tribunal considered for the first time the scope of the Regulator’s power to issue FSD. Led by Raquel Agnello QC.
- Box Clever. Decision of the Determinations Panel to issue FSD to members of ITV Group, see 26.1.12. Acted for Determinations Panel of the Pensions Regulator (2012).
- Michel van de Wiele (“Bonas”). First decision of the Upper Tribunal concerning the exercise of the Pensions Regulator’s moral hazard powers. Acted for the Regulator on the target’s unsuccessful application to strike out the Regulator’s case (2011).
- Lehman Brothers. Decision of the Determinations Panel, see 17.9.10. Acted for Pensions Regulator with J. Hilliard, led by Raquel Agnello QC (2010). Also in preliminary hearings before Upper Tribunal (2012 and 2014).
- Nortel Networks. Decision of the Determinations Panel, see 25.6.10. Acted for Pensions Regulator with J. Hilliard, led by Raquel Agnello QC (2010).