A hidden gem? The ‘sufficient connection with the jurisdiction’ test under s.423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 in the light of Suppipat v Narogdej [2023] EWHC 1988 (Comm)’

Related Insights View all thought leadership

1. 

   Articles

   A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

   In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

   By Alice Hawker
   Monday 19 October 2026

   View more
2. 

   Articles

   Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

   In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

   By Ernest Leung
   Tuesday 13 October 2026

   View more
3. 

   Recent Cases

   Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

   Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

   Thomas Grant KC
   Friday 9 October 2026

   View more
4. 

   Recent Cases

   Permission to proceed? Derivative claim denied

   Company law, Commercial disputes, Joint venture and partnership disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

   Nikki Singla KC | Caspar Bartscherer
   Tuesday 6 October 2026

   View more

View all thought leadership