Credit Suisse Virtuoso SICAV-SIF & Anr v Softbank Group Corp. & Ors [2025]
[2025] EWHC 2631 (Ch)
This case concerned Greensill Limited, part of the Greensill Capital group founded by Lex Greensill, which collapsed into insolvency in 2021.
The First Claimant, a sub-fund of Credit Suisse, had invested in loan notes with a face value of $440 million (the “Fairymead Notes”). By the “Impugned Transactions,” Greensill was left without assets and Credit Suisse was deprived of security.
The Claimants succeeded in establishing that: (i) the relevant transactions were the two Impugned Transactions (not a wider network of transactions relied upon by SoftBank); (ii) those transactions were at an undervalue; and (iii) Greensill Limited (through Lex Greensill) had the relevant purpose under section 423. It was not in issue that Credit Suisse was a victim, and the Court rejected any argument that the remedy should take into account the Claimants’ “fault.”
Nonetheless, Lord Justice Miles declined to order relief against SoftBank, describing this as an “exceptional” result (as recognised in BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA). This was justified because the case was not a typical straightforward transfer of assets to a third party, and the value of the assets fell to nil through no fault or action of SoftBank.
Accordingly, although all the elements of section 423 were made out, the Court refused to grant any relief and dismissed the claim.



