PropertyWednesday 10 January 2024
The Claimant had served valid notices to exercise valuable options in three leases but had omitted to pay the 10% deposits which were due by midnight on the date the Claimant exercised the options. HHJ Hodge KC (sitting as a High Court Judge) accepted the Claimant’s argument that time was not of the essence for payment of the three deposits. Whilst it is conventional for time to be of the essence for payment of a deposit under a sale and purchase agreement (see Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1445), the circumstances of this case were sufficient to take it out of the ordinary run of cases. There were two principal reasons: (1) this is not the case of a payment of a deposit on an ordinary contract for the sale and purchase of land, but rather the exercise of a tenant’s option to purchase the landlord’s reversionary interest; and (2) on the true interpretation of the option provisions, time should not be treated as being of the essence for the payment of the deposits.
Alice Hawker was instructed by Freeths and appeared for the successful Claimant.
People to view:
News
We are delighted to announce that Wilberforce has been shortlisted in four categories at the Chambers UK Bar Awards 2026. Chancery Set of the Year Company/Insolvency Set of the Year Real Estate Set of the Year Real Estate Junior of... Read more
Wednesday 12 August 2026
View more
External Conferences
Thursday 12 November 2026 | 9.15am - 4.30pm
The Royal Society of Medicine, London
Speakers:
Joanne Wicks KC | Mark Galtrey
External Conferences
Thursday 17 September 2026 | 12.30pm - 7pm
The Midland Hotel, Manchester
£75 for PLA members
Speakers:
Tiffany Scott KC
Articles
Article by Joanne Wicks KC and Naomi Kilcoyne, published 20th July 2026 This article was originally published by Estates Gazette here. The law is often required to decide which of two innocent parties should bear the brunt of another’s wrongdoing. This... Read more
By Joanne Wicks KC | Naomi Kilcoyne
Monday 20 July 2026