Back to Insights listing

PropertyThursday 12 October 2023

Judgment handed down in Gill v Lees News Ltd

In Gill v Lees News Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 1178 the Court of Appeal has today given important guidance on some of the grounds on which a landlord may oppose the grant of a new tenancy to a business tenant under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.

Three of the grounds of opposition – grounds (a), (b) and (c) – are concerned with tenant default or misbehaviour: ground (a) with disrepair; ground (b) with persistent delay in paying rent and ground (c) with other substantial breaches of the tenancy or with aspects of the tenant’s use and management. In each case the court is required to make a decision as to whether the tenant “ought not” to be granted a new tenancy in view of the default or misbehaviour.

The Court has decided that ground (a) does not confine the court to consideration of the state of repair of the holding at the date of the hearing. It is engaged by even minor disrepair at the date of the landlord’s s.25/s.26(6) notice and earlier in the term. The consequence of this decision is that a landlord may oppose the grant of a new tenancy on ground (a) even though the disrepair has been remedied, although the substantiality of the disrepair and whether or not the tenant has remedied it are both clearly relevant to the court’s judgment as to whether the tenant “ought not” to be granted a new tenancy.

The Court of Appeal has also confirmed that disrepair to areas of the premises other than the holding falls within ground (c).

Guidance has also been given about the width of the value judgment as to whether or not a tenant “ought not” to be granted a new tenancy. There are many factors of potential relevance to this decision. The court does not consider matters only from the perspective of the landlord but may consider the consequences for the tenant of refusing a new tenancy. The decision in Gill v Lees News also provides welcome clarification that the court does not take a compartmentalised approach to its value judgment, but should look at the grounds both individually and cumulatively. This clears up some previous tension in the authorities.

Joanne Wicks KC appeared for the successful Respondent with Ben Walker-Nolan of Thomas More Chambers, instructed by David Cooper of David Cooper & Co.

To read the full judgment, please click here.

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder


    Four wins for Wilberforce at Chambers UK Bar Awards 2023

    We are absolutely delighted to have picked up four awards at last night’s Chambers UK Bar Awards! We are proud to announce that Wilberforce Chambers won the highly coveted ‘Set of the Year‘ award, as well as ‘Chancery Set of... Read more

    Friday 1 December 2023

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 – Refine, Reform or Reject? A Panel Debate

    Wednesday 6th December 2023 | 6pm - 7.15pm, followed by drinks
    Hogan Lovells International LLP, Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2FG

    View more
  3. Placeholder


    Considering the recent Court of Appeal decision on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

    Listen to Joanne Wicks KC and Benjamin Faulkner on our latest #WilberforceWebchat as they consider a recent Court of Appeal decision on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The case provides helpful guidance about the grounds of opposition to the... Read more

    Joanne Wicks KC | Benjamin Faulkner
    Tuesday 17 October 2023

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment handed down in CPF One Limited & anor v Ortus Secured Finance I Limited

    Banking and financial services, Property, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Zoë Barton KC | Jia Wei Lee
    Thursday 5 October 2023

    View more

View all thought leadership