Back to Insights listing

PropertyFriday 12 May 2023

Supreme Court Decision on Oil Spill Continuing Nuisance Appeal

On 10 May 2023, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Jalla & Anr v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company & Anr [2023] UKSC 16, an appeal concerning the law of continuing private nuisance.

The Claimants, who live and own property by or in the hinterland of the Nigerian Atlantic shoreline, brought a claim against various entities in the Royal Dutch Shell group of companies in respect of an oil spill that occurred in the offshore Bonga oil field in late 2011 before the English High Court. The Bonga oil spill comprised approximately 40,000 – 42,500 barrels and was one of the largest offshore oil spills in Nigerian oil exploration history.

The Defendants contested the jurisdiction of the English High Court over this claim on the basis, amongst other things, that the Claimants’ claims against the English anchor defendant were time-barred.

At first instance, Stuart-Smith J (as he then was) ruled that, subject to questions of limitation, the English Court had jurisdiction to try the claims. However, he rejected the Claimants’ argument that fresh causes of action continued to accrue on the basis that the interference with their land by the ongoing presence of crude oil from the Bonga oil spill was a continuing nuisance.

The Claimants’ appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed by Coulson, Newey and Lewison LJJ on 27 January 2021, but permission to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the continued presence of crude oil from the Bonga Spill could amount in law to a continuing nuisance giving rise to fresh causes of action each day, so as to defeat the Defendants’ limitation defence to their claims in nuisance.

Lord Burrows rejected the Claimants’ arguments and dismissed their appeal. He held that in general terms, a continuing nuisance requires that there be, outside the claimant’s land and usually on the defendant’s land, repeated activity by the defendant or an ongoing state of affairs for which the defendant is responsible which causes continuing undue interference with the use and enjoyment of the claimant’s land. That test was not satisfied on the facts alleged by the Claimants where the leak constituting the source of the nuisance had been turned off after c. 6 hours.

Separately, Lord Burrows also refused the Defendants permission to cross-appeal on the questions whether there could in law be a cause of action in private nuisance at all where the nuisance emanates from the sea, or where it emanates from a single one-off event such as an oil spill.

The judgment is available here.

Jonathan Seitler KC and Alice Hawker acted for the Claimants/ Appellants, along with Stuart Cribb of Essex Court Chambers.

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    The Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 – Refine, Reform or Reject? A Panel Debate

    Wednesday 6th December 2023 | 6pm - 7.15pm, followed by drinks
    Hogan Lovells International LLP, Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2FG

    View more
  2. Placeholder


    Considering the recent Court of Appeal decision on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

    Listen to Joanne Wicks KC and Benjamin Faulkner on our latest #WilberforceWebchat as they consider a recent Court of Appeal decision on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. The case provides helpful guidance about the grounds of opposition to the... Read more

    Joanne Wicks KC | Benjamin Faulkner
    Tuesday 17 October 2023

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment handed down in Gill v Lees News Ltd


    Joanne Wicks KC
    Thursday 12 October 2023

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment handed down in CPF One Limited & anor v Ortus Secured Finance I Limited

    Banking and financial services, Property, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Zoë Barton KC | Jia Wei Lee
    Thursday 5 October 2023

    View more

View all thought leadership