Back to Insights listing

International / offshore, Commercial disputesMonday 14 September 2020

TN Ramnauth and Company Ltd v Estate Management and Business Development Company Ltd

In August 2020, the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago handed down a long-anticipated judgment in TN Ramnauth and Company Ltd v Estate Management and Business Development Company Ltd  exploring the tort of an unlawful means conspiracy in the context of civil fraud claims brought by the government and government organisations against a large number of defendants, including former government ministers and public officials.

David Phillips QC represented the claimants in successfully resisting the procedural and substantive challenges brought against the claims.

One of the challenges that was successfully resisted was that the tort of an unlawful means conspiracy is one that is not recognised in Trinidad and Tobago – a very important decision in the context of these particular claims.  Of interest beyond Trinidad and Tobago is the judge’s detailed review of the ingredients of a variety of civil fraud claims, and the level of particulars that must be pleaded to establish those claims.  The decision is based on a widescale review of authorities from many Commonwealth jurisdictions, including the decision in Three Rivers, and draws those principles together in one integrated judgment.

Click here to download and read the judgment.

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Thomas Grant KC
    Friday 9 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Permission to proceed? Derivative claim denied

    Company law, Commercial disputes, Joint venture and partnership disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Nikki Singla KC | Caspar Bartscherer
    Tuesday 6 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership