Back to Events listing

Property

Is the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 now dead?

Thursday 6 July 2017
6.30pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks and canapés
The Law Society, 113 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1PL
1 CPD

S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Limited [2017] EWHC 1670 (QB)
 
– Is the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 now dead?

On 3 July 2017 Jay J handed down judgment in an appeal from the County Court at Central London in a ground (f) case which raises fascinating issues about a landlord’s ability to circumvent the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 and deprive the tenant of its security of tenure.

The landlord had devised a package of works with its lawyers, expressly with a view to achieving ground (f). Elements of the scheme were entirely artificial and had no practical or economic purpose, and the end result would be the creation of a space which could not lawfully, on planning grounds, be used by anybody. The County Court judge found that the scheme “had been designed with the material intention of undertaking works that would lead to the eviction of the tenant regardless of the works’ commercial or practical utility and irrespective of the expense”. Nevertheless, being “prepared to do whatever is necessary to get the Tenant out”, the landlord offered an undertaking that it would carry out the scheme, at a cost of over £700,000.

Despite the obvious artificiality of the works, the landlord succeeded. The tenant argued that this undermined the policy of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, which is to give business tenants real and substantial security of tenure. If a landlord can devise a package of works with its lawyers, give an undertaking to carry them out, succeed in evicting the tenant and then simply reverse the works afterwards, the Act is dead.

But the County Court said, and the Queen Bench Division agreed, that this argument could not succeed, in particular given the cases about the landlord’s motives for the work being irrelevant under ground (f).

Where does this leave the 1954 Act? Joanne Wicks QC (who appeared for the tenant) and Martin Hutchings QC will give a concise explanation of the case and the points in it of general importance to property litigators.

 

Date: Thursday 6 July 2017

Time: 6.30pm – 7.30pm (arrival drinks and registration from 6.00pm)

Venue:  The Law Society, 113 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1PL

Booking: see link below

Further information: seminars@wilberforce.co.uk  /  020 7306 0102

There is no charge to attend this seminar

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    Section 91 of the Law of Property Act 1925 – Court of Appeal decision on conduct of sale of property in receivership

    Tiffany Scott KC has written an article analysing the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Fairmont Property Developers v Venus Bridging Ltd. In the article Tiffany poses the question:  When will the court order that a borrower be given conduct of... Read more

    By Tiffany Scott KC
    Monday 2 March 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    External Conferences

    PLA South Coast Spring Training

    Thursday 23 April 2026 | 12.15pm
    Foot Anstey, Southampton

    Free to attend for PLA members

    Speakers:
    Jonathan Seitler KC | Mark Galtrey | Naomi Kilcoyne

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    Property Breakfast Briefing – Damages: some tricky bits

    Tuesday 10 March 2026 | 8.30am - 9.30am
    Wilberforce Chambers, 77 Chancery Lane

    Free to attend | 1.0 CPD

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    Property Breakfast Briefing – Negotiating Damages and s.84(1) LPA Compensation

    Thursday 26 February 2026 | 8.30am - 9.30am
    Wilberforce Chambers, 77 Chancery Lane

    Free to attend | 1.0 CPD

    View more

View all thought leadership