Case note on UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC

Andreas Giannakopoulos has written a case note on UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC [2024] UKSC 30 which has recently been published in the Law Quarterly Review. The note examines the Supreme Court’s judgment in detail, including its indication that forum conveniens principles do not apply where a claimant seeks permission to serve a claim for an anti-suit injunction out of the jurisdiction in order to restrain breach of an arbitration agreement. It also considers the Supreme Court’s departure from obiter dicta in Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Company Chubb [2020] UKSC 38 regarding the identification of the governing law of an arbitration agreement.

Westlaw subscribers can read the full case note at the link below.

Read the full case note on Westlaw

Related Insights View all thought leadership

Events / Webinars
Trust structures in the crosshairs: When to worry and what to do
Thursday 4 June | 9am - 10.30am
The Wilberforce Building Chancery Lane, London
Free to attend
LIDW 2026
View more
News
New silks: Bobby Friedman KC and Jack Watson KC
Wilberforce Chambers is delighted to announce that Bobby Friedman and Jack Watson have been appointed King’s Counsel at today’s ceremony at Westminster Hall. Bobby Friedman KC Bobby is regularly instructed to lead teams in cases of the highest value and... Read more
Monday 23 March 2026
View more
Articles
Gateways for Chabra freezing injunctions: Gilbert v Broadoak
In this article Philippe Kuhn analyses the recent decision in Gilbert v Broadoak concerning novel jurisdictional arguments about gateways for service out in the context of worldwide freezing orders against Chabra respondents.
By Philippe Kuhn
Thursday 26 February 2026
View more
Articles
England and Wales Court of Appeal ruling on peremptory orders
Daniel Jukes has written an article on the recent judgment in LLC Eurochem North-West-2 v Techimont SPA & others [2026]. The key issue in this case turned on a question of statutory construction, namely whether pursuant to section 42 of... Read more
By Daniel Jukes
Wednesday 18 February 2026
View more