Back to Insights listing

International / offshore, Civil fraud and asset recoveryWednesday 28 August 2024

Cayman Court makes Indemnity and Interim Costs Awards – Cowan v Equis Special LP

Thomas Grant KC acted for the plaintiff in Cowan v Equis Special LP in a 3-day hearing considering applications to amend and for security for costs. Both applications raised interesting procedural issues concerning the Caymanian law of amendment and security.

In a lengthy written judgment ([2024] CIFSd 57) the judge, the Hon Justice Parker, granted the amendment application in large part and rejected the security application. In a subsequent written judgment handed down on 7 August the judge awarded the plaintiff the bulk of his costs of the applications on the indemnity basis, holding that that “Ds’ conduct across these applications was unreasonable to a high degree. The way in which they litigated these summonses was in the Court’s view outside the norm and warrants an Order of indemnity costs.”  This had the important consequence that, applying the decision in The Armand Hammer Foundation Inc v Hammer International Foundation (unreported, 24 April 2024) foreign lawyers’ costs were allowable. An interim payment of $560,000 was ordered.

Thomas led Stuart Cribb of Essex Court Chambers and was instructed by Gareth Murphy, Nicholas Dunne, Brett Basdeo, David Lee and Chaowei Fan of Walkers LLP.

Read the full judgment here

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Events

    LIIARC: Should You Even Bother? Making the Case for Bringing a Case

    Tuesday 24 November 2026 | 6pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks
    Wilberforce Chambers, 77 Chancery Lane

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Foreign judgments and issue estoppel: orthodoxy reasserted

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Andreas Giannakopoulos examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Aviator LLC v Spribe OÜ [2026] EWCA Civ 1224, considering whether the preclusive effect of a foreign judgment on a claim made in subsequent English proceedings is governed by English law or the law applicable to the underlying claim.

    By Andreas Giannakopoulos
    Wednesday 28 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    News

    Clare Stanley KC featured in Chambers & Partners Stars at the Bar 2027

    Clare Stanley KC has been named as one of Chambers’ Stars at the Bar, an accolade given to just 16 top barristers who are recognised for their excellence across a range of practice areas. Clare is ranked by Chambers &... Read more

    Tuesday 27 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership