Back to Insights listing

International / offshore, Civil fraud and asset recoveryWednesday 28 August 2024

Cayman Court makes Indemnity and Interim Costs Awards – Cowan v Equis Special LP

Thomas Grant KC acted for the plaintiff in Cowan v Equis Special LP in a 3-day hearing considering applications to amend and for security for costs. Both applications raised interesting procedural issues concerning the Caymanian law of amendment and security.

In a lengthy written judgment ([2024] CIFSd 57) the judge, the Hon Justice Parker, granted the amendment application in large part and rejected the security application. In a subsequent written judgment handed down on 7 August the judge awarded the plaintiff the bulk of his costs of the applications on the indemnity basis, holding that that “Ds’ conduct across these applications was unreasonable to a high degree. The way in which they litigated these summonses was in the Court’s view outside the norm and warrants an Order of indemnity costs.”  This had the important consequence that, applying the decision in The Armand Hammer Foundation Inc v Hammer International Foundation (unreported, 24 April 2024) foreign lawyers’ costs were allowable. An interim payment of $560,000 was ordered.

Thomas led Stuart Cribb of Essex Court Chambers and was instructed by Gareth Murphy, Nicholas Dunne, Brett Basdeo, David Lee and Chaowei Fan of Walkers LLP.

Read the full judgment here

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Thomas Grant KC
    Friday 9 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Commercial Court provides guidance on the significance of delay in worldwide freezing order applications

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Samuel Cathro
    Friday 4 September 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership