Commercial disputes, International / offshoreMonday 20 April 2026
The Privy Council has recently handed down judgment in long-running litigation between a Heineken subsidiary (Commonwealth Brewery) and Anheuser-Busch International, a subsidiary of the brewing conglomerate that manufactures Budweiser and other products.
Commonwealth Brewery was for over 40 years the exclusive distributor in the Bahamas for Anheuser’s products including Budweiser. The distribution agreement had no fixed term but was subject to an implied term that it was terminable on reasonable notice. Anheuser sought to terminate the distribution agreement by giving 3 1/2 months’ notice.
The issue in the litigation was whether this was a reasonable notice period. The judge at first instance held that it was not and that a minimum of 15 months was required. This was overturned on appeal. Commonwealth Brewery then appealed to the Privy Council.
Lord Hodge, giving the judgment of the Board, conducted a detailed review of the relevant case law on distribution agreements for the purposes of identifying the principles to be applied by a court when assessing whether a period of notice for termination is reasonable. Lord Hodge identified a non-exhaustive list of seven relevant factors from the case law.
Applying these factors to the case before it, the Privy Council upheld the decision of the appeal court and dismissed the appeal.
Alan Gourgey KC, leading Christopher Jenkins KC and Chizelle Cargill of Lennox Paton (Bahamas), acted for the successful respondent to the appeal.
People to view:
Articles
In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Andreas Giannakopoulos examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Aviator LLC v Spribe OÜ [2026] EWCA Civ 1224, considering whether the preclusive effect of a foreign judgment on a claim made in subsequent English proceedings is governed by English law or the law applicable to the underlying claim.
By Andreas Giannakopoulos
Wednesday 28 October 2026
News
Clare Stanley KC has been named as one of Chambers’ Stars at the Bar, an accolade given to just 16 top barristers who are recognised for their excellence across a range of practice areas. Clare is ranked by Chambers &... Read more
Tuesday 27 October 2026
View more
Articles
In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).
By Alice Hawker
Monday 19 October 2026
Articles
In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.
By Ernest Leung
Tuesday 13 October 2026