Back to Insights listing

Property, International / offshoreWednesday 27 March 2024

Court of Final Appeal judgment on Proper role of the first assignment in delineating common parts

In Donora Company Limited v The Incorporated Owners of Tsuen Kam Centre [2024] HKCFA 3, a judgment handed down on 8 February 2024, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal allowed the appeal and held that, on the proper construction of the deed of mutual covenants (DMC), the external walls are common parts in that multi-storey building.

The Court examined the significance of a first assignment in deciding whether the external walls are common parts. The Court held that a reservation clause (reserving the right to exclusive use of the external walls to the developer) in the first assignment at most only amounts to a covenant by the first purchaser to restrict the exercise of his right of possession regarding the external walls. There is no covenant by the developer as to how the external walls were to be used and the reservation clause in the first assignment could not be construed as a covenant excluding the possibility of the external walls being demarcated as common parts in the DMC.

Instead, it is the DMC that demarcates the common areas and facilities and these covenants are mutual covenants by every co-owner to other co-owners on common areas and facilities.

Therefore, the relevant character of the external walls is to be determined by reference to the DMC, though the first assignment may be referred to as an aid to construction in case of ambiguity in the DMC.

James Man acted for the appellant and was instructed, in his capacity as a barrister at Temple Chambers, by Mayer Brown. James Man and Jonathan Ng (Temple Chambers) were led by Benjamin Yu SC.

Read the full judgment

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    News

    Wilberforce nominated in multiple categories at Legal 500 Bar Awards

    Wilberforce Chambers is delighted to share that we have been nominated in multiple categories at Legal 500 Bar Awards including ‘Chancery Set of the Year’, ‘Commercial Litigation Set of the Year’ and ‘Marketing Team of the Year’. Congratulations to our... Read more

    Friday 20 June 2025

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Scrutinising landlord commissions in placing insurance (London Trocadero v Picturehouse Cinemas)

    Tiffany Scott KC has written a case analysis for LexisNexis, examining the important implications of the judgment in London Trocadero v Picturehouse Cinemas. The High Court has held that a landlord of commercial premises had been significantly overcharging its tenant... Read more

    By Tiffany Scott KC
    Thursday 19 June 2025

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Articles

    Supreme Court holds banks must follow the Etridge protocol where non-commercial hybrid transactions include a more than de minimis surety element

    Joanne Wicks KC has written an expert commentary regarding her recent judgment on Waller-Edwards v One Savings Back Plc. The commentary has been published in LexisNexis. The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal, holding that a creditor is put... Read more

    By Joanne Wicks KC
    Monday 9 June 2025

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Supreme Court hands down judgment in Waller-Edwards v One Savings Bank

    Property

    Joanne Wicks KC
    Wednesday 4 June 2025

    View more

View all thought leadership