Events
LIIARC: Should You Even Bother? Making the Case for Bringing a Case
Tuesday 24 November 2026 | 6pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks
Wilberforce Chambers, 77 Chancery Lane
Commercial disputes, Civil fraud and asset recoveryThursday 10 October 2024
High Court hands down judgment on Jaffé v Greybull Capital LLP
The High Court handed down judgment on Jaffé v Greybull Capital LLP [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm), following a 3-week, multimillion-pound Commercial Court fraud claim brought by the insolvency administrator of Wirecard.
The Claimants had sought c. £12m in damages for deceit, alleging that a deliberate oral misrepresentation at a meeting in 2016 led to Wirecard Bank extending credit to Monarch Airlines (which subsequently became insolvent). Mrs Justice Cockerill DBE dismissed the case in its entirety. In her judgment, she considered the conflicting accounts of two “equally patently honest and truthful witnesses”, the inherent probabilities and the surrounding circumstances, and, notwithstanding a near-contemporaneous note of the meeting taken by one of the Claimants’ witnesses, concluded that the alleged misrepresentations had not been made. The Judge agreed with the Defendants that German law applied to the claim and considered and applied the German law of causation, concluding that even if the misrepresentations had been made, they had not been relied upon.
Of particular interest is the Judge’s consideration of “Gestmin” and the matters raised by Popplewell LJ in his 2023 COMBAR lecture “Judging Truth from Memory”.
John Wardell KC, instructed by Andrew Head, Bryan Shacklady and David Young (Forsters LLP) and leading Thomas Elias (Serle Court), acted on behalf of the successful Defendants.
People to view:
Related Insights View all thought leadership
Articles
Foreign judgments and issue estoppel: orthodoxy reasserted
In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Andreas Giannakopoulos examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Aviator LLC v Spribe OÜ [2026] EWCA Civ 1224, considering whether the preclusive effect of a foreign judgment on a claim made in subsequent English proceedings is governed by English law or the law applicable to the underlying claim.
By Andreas Giannakopoulos
View more
Wednesday 28 October 2026News
Clare Stanley KC featured in Chambers & Partners Stars at the Bar 2027
Clare Stanley KC has been named as one of Chambers’ Stars at the Bar, an accolade given to just 16 top barristers who are recognised for their excellence across a range of practice areas. Clare is ranked by Chambers &... Read more
Tuesday 27 October 2026
View moreArticles
A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?
In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).
By Alice Hawker
View more
Monday 19 October 2026
