Back to Insights listing

Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes, International / offshoreFriday 9 October 2026

Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

The much anticipated judgment in the case of JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others was handed down by the East Caribbean Court of Appeal on 7 October 2026. The claimant bank had sought permission to serve out against a large number of foreign defendants in respect of an alleged fraudulent conspiracy founded on numerous letters of credit and valued at over $230million. At the inter partes hearing, which lasted 4 days, Wallbank J had set aside permission previously granted ex parte. The bank’s appeal was dismissed. The judgment will be required reading for any claimant seeking to serve out in BVI litigation in reliance on CPR r.7.3(2). This may be the last chapter in the very long running Ablyazov litigation.

Read the full judgment

Thomas Grant KC, instructed by Matthew Freeman of Maples Group, acted for some of the successful commodity trader respondents

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    Foreign judgments and issue estoppel: orthodoxy reasserted

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Andreas Giannakopoulos examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Aviator LLC v Spribe OÜ [2026] EWCA Civ 1224, considering whether the preclusive effect of a foreign judgment on a claim made in subsequent English proceedings is governed by English law or the law applicable to the underlying claim.

    By Andreas Giannakopoulos
    Wednesday 28 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    News

    Clare Stanley KC featured in Chambers & Partners Stars at the Bar 2027

    Clare Stanley KC has been named as one of Chambers’ Stars at the Bar, an accolade given to just 16 top barristers who are recognised for their excellence across a range of practice areas. Clare is ranked by Chambers &... Read more

    Tuesday 27 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership