Events
LIIARC: Should You Even Bother? Making the Case for Bringing a Case
Tuesday 24 November 2026 | 6pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks
Wilberforce Chambers, 77 Chancery Lane
Commercial disputes, Banking and financial services, Civil fraud and asset recovery, International / offshoreTuesday 20 December 2022
No obstacles to enforcement of an English costs order in the UAE
In a recently published judgment in Invest Bank v El-Husseini and Others [2022] EWHC 3008 (Comm), Mr Justice Bryan dismissed applications for security for costs by four defendants against the Claimant, a bank based in the UAE. The defendants contended that security should be ordered in circumstances where there was a real risk that an English costs order would not be enforceable in the UAE, either onshore or offshore (in the DIFC). In dismissing the application, the Judge rejected the extensive expert evidence on UAE law submitted by the defendants to the effect that there was a real risk enforcement could be refused because of absence of reciprocity of enforcement between the UAE and England, and/or because enforcement of a costs order would be contrary to the public policy of the UAE.
In rejecting that evidence, the Judge held that it is clear that there is reciprocity of enforcement of judgments between the English court and the UAE courts, and that enforcement of a costs order is not contrary to the public policy of the UAE. The Judge also found that “a straightforward route” to enforcement of an English costs would be to enforce the judgment in the DIFC and then to enforce the resulting DIFC judgment in the UAE.
Alan Gourgey KC (leading Marc Delehanty of Littleton Chambers) acted for the Claimant bank, together with PCB Byrne’s team led by Trevor Mascarenhas.
A copy of the judgment is available to read here.
People to view:
Related Insights View all thought leadership
Articles
Foreign judgments and issue estoppel: orthodoxy reasserted
In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Andreas Giannakopoulos examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Aviator LLC v Spribe OÜ [2026] EWCA Civ 1224, considering whether the preclusive effect of a foreign judgment on a claim made in subsequent English proceedings is governed by English law or the law applicable to the underlying claim.
By Andreas Giannakopoulos
View more
Wednesday 28 October 2026
News
Clare Stanley KC featured in Chambers & Partners Stars at the Bar 2027
Clare Stanley KC has been named as one of Chambers’ Stars at the Bar, an accolade given to just 16 top barristers who are recognised for their excellence across a range of practice areas. Clare is ranked by Chambers &... Read more
Tuesday 27 October 2026
View more
Articles
A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?
In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).
By Alice Hawker
View more
Monday 19 October 2026