
Events
LIIARC: Should You Even Bother? Making the Case for Bringing a Case
Tuesday 24 November 2026 | 6pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks
Wilberforce Chambers, 77 Chancery Lane
Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputesThursday 20 November 2025
On 13 November 2025, judgment was handed down by Stephen Houseman KC in the case of Ricardo Salinas Pliego v Astor Asset Management [2025] EWHC 2968.
John Wardell KC, instructed by LK Law, acted for the claimants, Mr Salinas and Corporation RBS, who are the alleged victims of an alleged $400 million stock lending fraud carried out by Mr Sklarov – the 4th Defendant. Mr Sklarov had allegedly funded $75 million of a $115 million loan by secretly selling the shares put up as collateral.
The Defendants applied to strike out the proceedings, arguing that Black Cube’s conduct constituted an abuse of process. The Claimants maintained that the evidence was admissible as it did not extend beyond material already in the public domain and, in any event, fell within the iniquity principle and was therefore not privileged.
The Judge failed to determine the public domain and iniquity principles and refused to strike out the claim. However, he held that the Claimants had forfeited the right to bring a summary judgment application as a result of Black Cube’s conduct.
People to view:

Events
Tuesday 24 November 2026 | 6pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks
Wilberforce Chambers, 77 Chancery Lane

Articles
In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Andreas Giannakopoulos examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Aviator LLC v Spribe OÜ [2026] EWCA Civ 1224, considering whether the preclusive effect of a foreign judgment on a claim made in subsequent English proceedings is governed by English law or the law applicable to the underlying claim.
By Andreas Giannakopoulos
Wednesday 28 October 2026

News
Clare Stanley KC has been named as one of Chambers’ Stars at the Bar, an accolade given to just 16 top barristers who are recognised for their excellence across a range of practice areas. Clare is ranked by Chambers &... Read more
Tuesday 27 October 2026
View more
Articles
In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).
By Alice Hawker
Monday 19 October 2026