Back to Events listing

Commercial disputes

Norwich Pharmacal: A Settled Jurisdiction or Room for Manoeuvre?

Wednesday 24 June
8.30am - 10.30am
Gallagher's, London

Thomas Grant KC is speaking at a breakfast briefing hosted by TL4 disputes on Norwich Pharmacal: A Settled Jurisdiction or Room for Manoeuvre?

Norwich Pharmacal relief remains a vital tool for litigants seeking disclosure from third parties mixed up in frauds, but recent case law continues to shape – and in some cases challenge – its boundaries. With the courts refining how and when such relief may be granted, questions remain as to how settled the jurisdiction truly is. 

In this breakfast briefing, Gary Orritt (Rahman Ravelli) and Andrew Barns‑Graham (3 Hare Court ) will discuss the latest developments affecting Norwich Pharmacal applications and consider the key issues litigants must navigate. The panel will explore practical considerations, common pitfalls, and strategic risks, as well as where opportunities may still arise in an evolving legal landscape. With one eye on future developments, the panel intends to cover wider issues to engage the audience on this topical area. 

Hosted by Marlon Pinto (AnotherDay), who will open the session and introduce the speakers, this event offers valuable insights for litigators and in‑house counsel involved in disclosure‑driven and investigative litigation. The talk will also feature introductory remarks from Thomas Grant KC.

More information

 

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Thomas Grant KC
    Friday 9 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Permission to proceed? Derivative claim denied

    Company law, Commercial disputes, Joint venture and partnership disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Nikki Singla KC | Caspar Bartscherer
    Tuesday 6 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership