Back to Events listing

International arbitration, Commercial disputes, Domestic arbitration

WATCH: Arbitration Breakfast Briefing: Conflicts, bias and disclosure duties – where are we now?

Thursday 11 March 2021
9am - 10am UK time
Online, Zoom
1.0 CPD

Arbitration Breakfast Briefing: apparent bias and arbitrators’ duty of disclosure in international commercial arbitrations following the Supreme Court’s decision in Halliburton v Chubb; and the duty of expert witnesses in arbitration proceedings to avoid conflicts of interest.

Join Stuart Isaacs QC, Jamie Holmes and Jia Wei Lee in a discussion about the scope of the obligation of arbitrators involved in international commercial arbitrations to make disclosure of possible conflicts of interest, the circumstances in which this might lead to a finding of apparent bias that requires their removal, and the interaction with their other contractual duties, in the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Halliburton Company v Chubb [2020] UKSC 48.

The discussion explores what the case decides, whether, after the initial flurry of interest in this long-awaited decision, its significance has been overestimated and what its implications will be going forwards.

This arbitration breakfast briefing also gives the opportunity to consider the Court of Appeal’s 11 January 2021 decision in Secretariat Consulting Pte Ltd v A Company [2021] EWCA Civ 6 which concerned the duty of a party-appointed expert in arbitration proceedings to avoid conflicts of interest and the interaction of this with their other contractual duties.

There will be more sessions to follow in the series, covering different topics of interest.

If you have any questions, please email seminars@wilberforce.co.uk


People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Thomas Grant KC
    Friday 9 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Permission to proceed? Derivative claim denied

    Company law, Commercial disputes, Joint venture and partnership disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Nikki Singla KC | Caspar Bartscherer
    Tuesday 6 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership