Back to Insights listing

Commercial disputesFriday 9 August 2024

Court of Appeal hands down judgment in Mex Group Worldwide Ltd v Ford & Ors

On 8th August 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mex Group Worldwide Ltd v Ford & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 959 following a 3-day hearing in July.

The case is the first appellate decision to consider the scope of the ‘expediency’ requirement under s.25 of the CJJA 1982 following the landmark decision of the Privy Council in Convoy Collateral Ltd v Broad Idea International Ltd [2021] UKPC 24, and the implementation of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018.

It will also be of interest to practitioners for its guidance on the approach to applications to set aside WFOs obtained on an ex parte basis for breaches of full and frank disclosure – in particular the deprecation of the torrential approach frequently adopted by respondents . As Males LJ explained at [112], “In future, if the court is presented with a long shopping list of alleged failures of disclosure, with no attempt made to identify the relatively few points which really matter, it should simply decline to consider the issue at all.”

Thomas Grant KC and Daniel Petrides acted with Caley Wright (Maitland Chambers) for the appellants, instructed by Mark Hastings and James Clark of Quillon Law.

Read the full judgment

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Thomas Grant KC
    Friday 9 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Permission to proceed? Derivative claim denied

    Company law, Commercial disputes, Joint venture and partnership disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Nikki Singla KC | Caspar Bartscherer
    Tuesday 6 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership