Back to Insights listing

Commercial disputesFriday 31 January 2025

Court of Appeal judgment on damages law handed down in Barrowfen Properties Limited v Patel

On 23 January 2025, judgment was handed down by the Court of Appeal on issues of damages law in Barrowfen Properties Limited v Patel and others [2025] EWCA Civ 39.

At trial, the Court made various findings of dishonest breaches of directors’ duties against the First Defendant and of negligence against the Second Defendant firm of solicitors.

The trial judge awarded damages based on the lost rental income suffered because of the delay in the development of Barrowfen’s commercial property in Tooting. The principal award of £4 million was reduced down to £1.7 million because Barrowfen was required to give credit for the increased capital value of the revised development scheme implemented compared to the original development scheme that would have been implemented at an earlier date.

Both Barrowfen and the Second Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeal on issues of damages law about the application of the credit, but the decision of the trial judge was upheld (other than on a point about the amount of interest as damages):

  1. Barrowfen appealed on the basis that it intended to hold the property as an income-producing asset and that once the increased finance costs of the more expensive revised development scheme were taken into account there was no credit to be given. The Court of Appeal analysed the leading cases on mitigation, causation and betterment and dismissed Barrowfen’s appeal on the basis that the decision to retain the Tooting property (and incur future financing costs) rather than sell it was an independent decision that broke the chain of causation.
  2. The Second Defendant cross-appealed, contending that the credit should be deducted (in full) after the application of the loss of a chance percentages, rather than before the application of the loss of a chance percentages. The Court of Appeal explained the decision in Hartle v Laceys and dismissed this main cross-appeal.

Tim Matthewson was instructed with Adam Kramer KC of 3VB by Withers to act for Barrowfen.

Read the full judgment

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Events / Webinars

    Trust structures in the crosshairs: When to worry and what to do

    Thursday 4 June | 9am - 10.30am
    The Wilberforce Building Chancery Lane, London

    Free to attend

    LIDW 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    News

    New silks: Bobby Friedman KC and Jack Watson KC

    Wilberforce Chambers is delighted to announce that Bobby Friedman and Jack Watson have been appointed King’s Counsel at today’s ceremony at Westminster Hall. Bobby Friedman KC Bobby is regularly instructed to lead teams in cases of the highest value and... Read more

    Monday 23 March 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Articles

    Gateways for Chabra freezing injunctions: Gilbert v Broadoak

    In this article Philippe Kuhn analyses the recent decision in Gilbert v Broadoak concerning novel jurisdictional arguments about gateways for service out in the context of worldwide freezing orders against Chabra respondents.

    By Philippe Kuhn
    Thursday 26 February 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Articles

    England and Wales Court of Appeal ruling on peremptory orders

    Daniel Jukes has written an article on the recent judgment in LLC Eurochem North-West-2 v Techimont SPA & others [2026]. The key issue in this case turned on a question of statutory construction, namely whether pursuant to section 42 of... Read more

    By Daniel Jukes
    Wednesday 18 February 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership