
Events / Webinars
Trust structures in the crosshairs: When to worry and what to do
Thursday 4 June | 9am - 10.30am
The Wilberforce Building Chancery Lane, London
Free to attend
LIDW 2026
View moreCommercial disputesThursday 30 January 2025
On 27 January 2025 the High Court dismissed the claim made in Hill v Touchlight Genetics Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 107 (Pat), a case concerning contractual rights to intellectual property.
Emily McKechnie (instructed by Bristows and acting with Adrian Speck KC and Henry Ward of 8 New Square) represented the successful defendants, the Touchlight group. The claim had been brought by Touchlight’s former chief scientific officer, Dr Hill, who argued that her innovative ideas had been developed prior to her employment with Touchlight and had not been contractually assigned to the company following the commencement of her employment.
The High Court held that the ideas were conceived by Dr Hill during her employment and were thereby contractually owned by Touchlight, and that in any event the disputed rights were assigned to Touchlight on the true construction of Dr Hill’s employment contract. The court also found that Dr Hill shared a common assumption with Touchlight (or made representations) to the effect that Touchlight was the owner of the disputed rights, that Touchlight was entitled to assume that Dr Hill supported its applications for patent protection based upon those rights, and that Touchlight relied upon Dr Hill to its detriment.
People to view:

Events / Webinars
Thursday 4 June | 9am - 10.30am
The Wilberforce Building Chancery Lane, London
Free to attend
LIDW 2026
View more
News
Wilberforce Chambers is delighted to announce that Bobby Friedman and Jack Watson have been appointed King’s Counsel at today’s ceremony at Westminster Hall. Bobby Friedman KC Bobby is regularly instructed to lead teams in cases of the highest value and... Read more
Monday 23 March 2026
View more
Articles
In this article Philippe Kuhn analyses the recent decision in Gilbert v Broadoak concerning novel jurisdictional arguments about gateways for service out in the context of worldwide freezing orders against Chabra respondents.
By Philippe Kuhn
Thursday 26 February 2026

Articles
Daniel Jukes has written an article on the recent judgment in LLC Eurochem North-West-2 v Techimont SPA & others [2026]. The key issue in this case turned on a question of statutory construction, namely whether pursuant to section 42 of... Read more
By Daniel Jukes
Wednesday 18 February 2026