Back to Insights listing

Commercial disputesMonday 3 August 2026

The High Court finds unfair prejudice in removal of founder from Big Motoring World by private equity investor

Peter Waddell and another v Bluebell Cars Holding and others [2026] EWHC 2028 (Ch)

The High Court has given judgment in Peter Waddell and another v Bluebell Cars Holding and others – one of The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2026.

A dispute arose between Big Motoring World founder Peter Waddell and private equity investor Freshstream following Mr Waddell’s removal from management after Freshstream acquired a minority stake in the business.

The case concerned whether Mr Waddell’s removal was properly carried out under the investment agreement, in light of both the company’s performance and an investigation into Waddell’s conduct. Mr Waddell alleged that his removal was unlawful and brought through his company (PWHL)  an unfair prejudice petition against Freshstream, Big Motoring World and two directors who had been appointed by Freshstream. A link to the full judgment can be found here.

Alan Gourgey KC, Anna Littler, Talia Barsam (Devereux Chambers) and Ernest Leung together with Jessica Brooke acted for the successful Petitioner/Claimants and were instructed by Justin Michaelson at Quinn Emanuel and a team including Simon Walsh, Sam Becroft, and Lakshana Radhakrishnan.

Rachael Earle acted for Mr Vaughan led by Graeme McPherson KC (4 New Square) and instructed by Kennedys.

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Thomas Grant KC
    Friday 9 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Permission to proceed? Derivative claim denied

    Company law, Commercial disputes, Joint venture and partnership disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Nikki Singla KC | Caspar Bartscherer
    Tuesday 6 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership