Back to Insights listing

Commercial disputes, Banking and financial servicesMonday 28 February 2022

Lebanese banks – who have been refusing to pay customers due to the country’s economic crisis – ordered to make international transfers

In one of The Lawyer’s ‘Top 20 Cases of 2022’, Manoukian v Société Générale Banque Liban and Bank Audi, Bobby Friedman and Caspar Bartscherer (led by Daniel Toledano QC), have successfully acted for Mr Manoukian in obtaining an order for payment of international transfers from his bank accounts held with the defendants, who are two of the largest banks in Lebanon.

Given the expedited nature of the Claim, Mr Justice Picken announced his decision on 25 February 2022, with reasons to follow.

Since the onset of the Lebanese economic crisis, Lebanese banks, including the defendants, have refused to make international transfers of the sums held with them in foreign currency by their customers.

Mr Vatche Manoukian, a dual national of Lebanon and the United Kingdom, was one of the customers who has been denied access to his funds. The banks steadfastly refused to pay Mr Manoukian and insisted that he had no right to an international transfer. Then, seven weeks before trial, the banks purported to “repay” Mr Manoukian by a process known as the “Tender and Deposit”, in which they deposited cheques with a notary public in Lebanon. The banks maintained that this gave them a further defence to the claim for an international transfer.

Mr Manoukian maintained throughout that he was entitled to an international transfer of his funds and also said that the “Tender and Deposit” was invalid because of the pre-existing obligation on the banks to perform the international transfer.

Mr Justice Picken has now decided that the banks are obliged to make the international transfers requested by Mr Manoukian.

This appears to be the first substantive decision outside of Lebanon holding that a customer has a right to an international transfer.

Bobby and Caspar were instructed by Graham Shear of BCLP, together with a team including Andrew Street and Fiona Boyle.

People to view:

Share by: Email

Related Insights View all thought leadership

  1. Placeholder

    Articles

    A fiduciary’s duty to disclose: a shield, not a sword?

    In the latest edition of our commercial litigation insights series, Alice Hawker examines the Court of Appeal's recent decision in G.I. Globinvestment Ltd v XY ERS UK Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1248, considering whether a fiduciary's duty to disclose is a shield (against claims alleging breach of the ’no conflict’ or ’no profit’ rules) or a sword (to be used as a freestanding claim).

    By Alice Hawker
    Monday 19 October 2026

    View more
  2. Placeholder

    Articles

    Nelson, what does your right eye see? When does wilful ignorance amount to dishonesty

    In this article in our commercial litigation insights series, Ernest Leung analyses the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Grosvenor Property Developers Limited v Portner Law Limited [2026] EWCA Civ 1238, which provides important guidance on the test for dishonesty in civil fraud claims and the circumstances in which "Nelsonian" or blind-eye knowledge can be imputed to a party.

    By Ernest Leung
    Tuesday 13 October 2026

    View more
  3. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Judgment of the ECSC Court of Appeal delivered in JSC BTA Bank v Mamesh and others

    Civil fraud and asset recovery, Commercial disputes

    Thomas Grant KC
    Friday 9 October 2026

    View more
  4. Placeholder

    Recent Cases

    Permission to proceed? Derivative claim denied

    Company law, Commercial disputes, Joint venture and partnership disputes, Trusts, probate and estates: contentious

    Nikki Singla KC | Caspar Bartscherer
    Tuesday 6 October 2026

    View more

View all thought leadership