Events / Webinars
Property Litigation: The Ultimate Goal
Wednesday 25 May 2016 | 2.00pm followed by drinks reception & bbq
The British Library, 96 Euston RdLondonNW1 2DB
£125 + VAT | 4.0 CPD
View moreJohn is a specialist in all areas of real property law and litigation, with particular emphasis on commercial leases and issues related to property development. He also has many years of experience in the law and practice of town planning and compulsory acquisition of land. He accepts instructions to act as an independent expert and as a legal assessor in arbitrations.
John’s practice is both advisory and litigious. The advisory work often relates to development projects and possible impediments to them (for example, restrictive covenants and easements), where a robust and reliable view is needed. Some recent decided cases will provide an impression of John’s litigious work. In Cosmichome Ltd v. Southampton City Council [2013] 1 WLR 2436, John established that a restrictive covenant relating to broadcasting studios was not enforceable because it was not intended to protect the amenity or value of the covenantee’s land. Mount Eden Land Ltd v. Bolsover Investments Ltd [2014] EWHC 3523 (Ch) concerned a landlord’s objection to the development of commercial premises to provide flats, on the grounds that future lessees of the flats might enjoy rights of enfranchisement; John established that, in the circumstances of the case, such an objection did not provide a reasonable ground for refusing consent to the proposed alterations. Stadium Capital (No. 2) Ltd v. St Marylebone Property Company Ltd [2012] 1 EGLR 103 was, as Vos J put it, “the third instalment of a long-running battle concerning an advertising hoarding on the west side of the Finchley Road, projecting into the airspace of a cleared development site”. In the “first instalment” John had established that his developer client was entitled to damages for trespass and the decision of Vos J is now one of the leading cases on the method of assessment of such damages.
Property
Examples of cases in which John has been instructed in the first half of 2023 are as follows:
During more than 40 years in practice, John has appeared in many reported cases in the House of Lords, Court of Appeal and at first instance. His cases in the Court of Appeal since 2000 are as follows, giving some illustration of the range of his work.
John is extremely good on the technical side of things and I have a lot of respect for his knowledge.
He never sits on the fence, always giving his views on an issue; his written advice is exceptionally clear.
User-friendly, very well regarded and impresses with his strategic advice.
Events / Webinars
Wednesday 25 May 2016 | 2.00pm followed by drinks reception & bbq
The British Library, 96 Euston RdLondonNW1 2DB
£125 + VAT | 4.0 CPD
View moreEvents / Webinars
Tuesday 16 September 2014 | 6.30pm - 7.30pm followed by drinks and canapés
Wilberforce Chambers, 16 New Square, London,
Domestic arbitration
John has more than forty years experience of dealing with disputes relating to the law of landlord and tenant and real property. As such disputes are often required to be referred for determination to an arbitrator or an expert, John is very familiar with the law applicable to such determinations and the procedure which must be followed. John has acted as an expert and arbitrator himself and has advised surveyors acting in these capacities, in addition to advising the parties to disputes referred for such determination. His essay on Expert determinations and the powers of the Court was published in Development Disputes (Wilberforce Chambers 2012).
Most recently John has advised a party to a rent review dispute on legal issues relating to mixed use premises on the fringe of the City of London, which was referred to an expert surveyor for decision. He also advised an expert surveyor who was appointed to determine a dispute relating to the sale of land and ‘onerous planning conditions’; for these purposes, he attended a hearing where the case was argued by leading counsel for the parties to the dispute.
John is extremely good on the technical side of things and I have a lot of respect for his knowledge.
He never sits on the fence, always giving his views on an issue; his written advice is exceptionally clear.
User-friendly, very well regarded and impresses with his strategic advice.